APHC010055242020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 3284/2020 Between: Bhogadi Prabhudas ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S LAKSHMI PRAMEELA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following order: 1. The petitioner claims that he is absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.37 cents in Sy.No.80/2 of Puligadda Village, Avanigadda Mandal, Krishna District, having purchased the same by virtue of registered sale deed dated 09.07.2001 vide document No.2474/2001. The petitioner further contends that his name is also mutated in revenue records and he was issued pattadar passbook and title deed over the subject land. Since the date of purchase, he claims that he is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same. 2. It is further case of the petitioner that while so, the 3rd respondent interfered with the possession of subject land and in fact 3rd respondent sent Village Revenue Officer on 04.02.2020 and threatened the petitioner that he will be evicted as the land is identified for the purpose of distribution of house sites under Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu Scheme. As the respondents tried to interfere with his possession, without following due process of law or without issuing any notice, the petitioner approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 3. On the other hand, the 3rd respondent furnished instructions dated 24.03.2025. 4. On perusal of the same, it is clear that the subject land is neither identified nor proposed for the purpose of distribution of house sites. It is further averred in the said instructions that the petitioner approached this Court on apprehension that the subject land may be identified for the said purpose. 5. In view of the clear assertion made by the 3rd respondent, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land except in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 10.04.2025 JLV 223 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 3284/2020 Date: 10.04.2025 JLV