1 2025:CGHC:58823 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6327 of 2025 1 - Hiraram Sahu S/o Late Shri Bisauha Ram Sahu Aged About 53 Years R/o Gram - Sirri, Tehsil - Kurud, District - Dhamtari (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector District - Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) District - Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Tehsil - Sirri, District - Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 5 - Nayab Tehsildar Tehsil - Sirri, District - Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 6 - Revenue Inspector Division - Darba, Tehsil - Kurud, District - Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 04/12/2025 BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.05 17:24:25 +0530 2 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “(i) That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the Respondents more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 01.04.2025 & report dated 28.03.2025. (ii) That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to the Respondents more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing them to immediately complete the process of demarcation of Khasra No. 1543/2 in a stipulated time period. (iii) That any other order/relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper and just in the facts and circumstances of the present case may also kindly be awarded to the petitioner in the ends of justice & equity. (iv) That the cost of the petition may kindly also be awarded to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has filed an application U/s. 129 of the C.G. Land Reveneu Code, 1959 for demarcation of his land, before respondent No.5. He submits that respondent No.5 while considering the application observed that as there is no partition in the revenue map, the demarcation is not possible. Petitioner submits that the job of partition based on the revenue entries is of the revenue officials for which the petitioner cannot be penalized. 3. Learned State counsel submits that the order Annexure P-1 is of the April, however, no document has been enclosed along with writ petition by petitioner asking the revenue officials or the Naib Tahsildar 3 to partition/divide the revenue map and thereafter, to proceed with the application for demarcation. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit an appropriate application for partition/division of the revenue map before the Naib Tahsildar, respondent No.5 and if such application is filed, the concerned authorities shall proceed with the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of two months and thereafter to proceed with the pending application U/s. 129 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands allowed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram