Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60441 (KAR)

KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAJM LTD v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

RP/100018/2024 · 2025-09-12

G Basavaraja, S R Krishna Kumar

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11943-DB RP No. 100018 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REVIEW PETITION NO. 100018 OF 2024 IN WRIT APPEAL NO.100236 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIJAY COMPLEX, HALIYAL ROAD, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD - 580003. 2. KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MLBCC DIVISION NO.2, NAVILUTEERTH, TQ.:SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591116. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MALAPRABHA PROJECT-III, BAGALKOTE, DIST: BAGALKOTE-587101. 2. TIPPAWWA VEERUPAKSHAPPA GHATTAD, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. Digitally signed by CHANABASAPPA K KALLUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.09.25 11:02:44 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11943-DB RP No. 100018 of 2024 3. SHANKREPPA BASAPPA BOGUR, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 4. SANGANAGOUDA CHITAMANIGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 5. CHINTAMANIGOUDA VINAYAKGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 79 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 6. BASAVARAJ SOMAPPA SHIGIHALLI, AGE: 73 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 7. MAHANTESH RUDRPPA BOGUR, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 8. GANGAPPA BASAPPA BOGUR, AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 9. SUNIL SOMAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 10. SHILAPPA @ RUDRAPPA NAGAPPA SHIGIHALLI, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11943-DB RP No. 100018 of 2024 11. RAJENDRA DEVENDRAPPA HANJI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 12. GANGAPPA DUNDAPPA BOGUR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 13. SHIVAPPA FAKIRAPPA BOGUR, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. 14. ADIVEPPA HOLEPPA KOTI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. TURAMARI, TQ.: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI-591128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADV. FOR R1; SRI. LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R7, R11, R13 AND R14) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE (1) OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 30.08.2023 PASSED IN WA NO. 100236/2023 (LA-RES) ONLY IN SO FAR AS, PERMITTING THE CLAIMANTS /RESPONDENTS NO. 2 TO WITHDRAW THE DEPOSITED AMOUNT MADE BY THE PETITIONERS AND SET ASIDE THE SAME TO SERVE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11943-DB RP No. 100018 of 2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) This review petition takes exception to the order dated 30.08.2023 passed in W.A.No.100236/2023 (LA-RES), whereby the said appeal filed by the review petitioners was dismissed by this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the review petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents jointly submit that under the identical circumstances in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s).51311/2023 dated 14.12.2023 arising out of identical orders passed by this Court, the Hon’ble Apex Court has held as under : “1. Delay condoned. 2. Since no order prejudicial to the interest of the respondent is being passed, requirement of notice is waived. 3. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court. However, we modify paragraph 7 of the impugned order passed by the High Court and direct that the withdrawal of - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11943-DB RP No. 100018 of 2024 the amount by the respondents/claimants shall be subject to their providing security to the satisfaction of the Trial Judge. 4. The Special leave petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.” 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2/claimant submits that by virtue of the order dated 13.12.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.116124/2019 (LA- RES), which was confirmed by this Court in Writ Appeal No.100236/2023 (LA-RES) dated 30.08.2023 and the order of the Hon’ble Apex Court referred supra, coupled with the fact that the review petitioner/appellant/KNNL deposited the amount and the same was withdrawn by the respondent/claimant and as such, nothing further survives in this review petition and the same has been rendered infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner/KNNL does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for respondents, regarding deposit of amount and withdrawal of the same by the respondent/claimant. Under the circumstances, - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11943-DB RP No. 100018 of 2024 nothing further survives in the present petition, which is accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE CKK CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 0