Sukhmen v. Chhattishgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
WPC/36/2018 · 2025-12-07
Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60439 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60439 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:59379
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 36 of 2018
1. Sukhmen Wd/o Late Sadhuram Gond, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Mayhapur, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh
2. Hridaylal S/o Late Sadhuram Gond, Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Mayhapur, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
3. Ramkeval S/o Late Sadhuram Gond, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Mayhapur, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
4. Ramkumar S/o Late Sadhuram Gond, Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Mayhapur, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. Chhattishgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Through Its Managing Director, Danganiya, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh
2. The Chief Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Division Namnakala, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh
3. The Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Ketka Road, Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
4. The Junior Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.12.09 11:13:50 +0530
2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.N. Parajapti, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 08/12/2025
1. The grievances raised by the petitioner has already been redressed, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh