VISHWANATH S/O GAVISIDDAPPA KARLI v. SMT SAROJA W/O SANGANNA MULIMANI
WP/106565/2025 · 2025-09-10
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60423 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60423 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11684 WP No. 106565 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 106565 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
VISHWANATH S/O. GAVISIDDAPPA KARLI, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BANNIKATTI AREA, KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583 231. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.M. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1) SMT. SAROJA W/O. SANGANNA MULIMANI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MAINALLI VILLAGE, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL-583 231,
2) BASAVARAJ S/O. IRAPPA HANCHINAL, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BENAKAL VILLAGE, TQ: KUKANOOR, DIST: KOPPAL - 583 232. 3) SMT. ANNAWWA W/O. SHANKRAPPA ANGADI, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI TEACHER, R/O: BENAKAL VILLAGE, TQ: KUKANOOR, DIST: KOPPAL - 583 232. 4) SHIVAPPA S/O. IRAPPA HANCHINAL, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BENAKAL VILLAGE, TQ: KUKANOOR,
Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11684 WP No. 106565 of 2025
DIST: KOPPAL- 583 232. 5) SMT. AKKAMMA W/O. BASAVARAJ ULLAGADDI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: ANGANWADI TEACHER, R/O: GUDLANUR, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL-583 238. 6) RAVI S/O. IRAPPA HANCHINAL, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BENAKAL VILLAGE, TQ: KUKANOOR, DIST: KOPPAL - 583 232. 7) SMT. SHOBHA W/O. YALLAPPA HULLUR, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: NAREGAL, TQ: RON, DIST: GADAG -582 119. 8) SMT. SUMANGALA W/O. SHIVARAJ KARLI, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: GANESH NAGAR, KOPPAL - 583 231. 9) ARUNKUMAR S/O. SHIVARAJ KARLI, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: GANESH NAGAR, KOPPAL- 583 231. 10) ANILKUMAR S/O. SHIVARAJ KARLI, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: GANESH NAGAR, KOPPAL-583231. 11) ANITA D/O. SHIVARAJ KARLI, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: GANESH NAGAR, KOPPAL-583231. 12) BASAVARAJ S/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA KARLI, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: STATION AREA, BEHIND RAGHAVENDRA SWAMI MATH, KOPPAL-583 231. 13) SMT. GANGAWWA W/O. SHARANAPPA PATTED, R/O: BENAKAL VILLAGE, TQ: KUKANOOR,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11684 WP No. 106565 of 2025
DIST: KOPPAL - 583 232. 14) SMT. KALAKAWWA W/O. SHIVARAJ KARLI, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: STATION AREA, BEHIND RAGHAVENDRA SWAMI MATH, KOPPAL-583 231. 15) SMT. GOURAWWA W/O. SANGAPPA UPADHYA, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: ABBIGERI, TQ: RON, DIST: GADAG -582 111. 16) SMT. GIRIJAWWA W/O. PAKEERAPPA DAMBAL, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HANDRAL VILLAGE, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL-583 238. 17) SMT.
SHANTAMMA W/O. SHARANAPPA GUDLANUR, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HALAGERI, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL - 583 238,
18) SMT. SHIVALEELA W/O. BASAVARAJ HALLIKERI, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: GONDABAL VILLAGE, TQ & DIST: KOPPAL- 583 238. 19) SHARANAPPA S/O. VEERAPPA WANAGERI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: WARD NO.24, BEHIND RAGHAVENDRA SWAMI MATH, KOPPAL-583 231. 20) SMT. IRAMMA W/O. SUDHAKAR HULIMAJJIGI, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MORGERI VILLAGE, TQ: H.B. HALLI, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR -583 212. 21) SMT. BASAMMA W/O. GAVISIDDAPPA KARLI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11684 WP No. 106565 of 2025
R/O: BANNIKATTI AREA, KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL - 583 231. 22) MANJUNATH S/O. GAVISIDDAPPA KARLI, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BANNIKATTI AREA, KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL - 583 231. 23) SHARAMMA D/O. GAVISIDDAPPA KARLI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BANNIKATTI AREA, KOPPAL, DIST: KOPPAL - 583 231. …RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ORDER 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED. 20-06-2025 PASSED ON IA NO. 10 AND 11 OF 2025 BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT KOPPAL IN FDP NO. 2/2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-P IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11684 WP No. 106565 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Notice to Respondent is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated. 20-06-2025 passed on IA No. 10 and 11 of 2025 by the court of Senior Civil Judge and CJM at Koppal in FDP No. 2/2019 produced at Annexure-P in the interest of justice and equity. ii.
Pass any such order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit in the interest of justice and equity. 3. In FDP No. 2 of 2019, the petitioner filed I.A. Nos. 10 and 11 under Order XXVI Rule 13 CPC seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to demarcate their schedule properties based on sale deeds dated 10.07.2014, 01.08.2014, and a gift deed dated
31.01.2017. - 6 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11684 WP No. 106565 of 2025
4. The IAs were allowed and a Commissioner appointed. The grievance of the petitioners is that the Commissioner is proceeding to execute the warrant based solely on the decree dated 17.08.2007 in O.S. No. 167/2000, ignoring the subsequent registered transactions. 5. On hearing counsel and perusal of documents, it is clear that the decree predates the sale and gift deeds. The subsequent transactions, executed with knowledge of the judgment and decree, attracts Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act. Hence, those deeds hold no legal value, and no claim can be made based on them. 6. The FDP proceedings can only continue with the warrant being executed strictly in terms of the decree in O.S. No. 167/2000. No infirmity is found in the trial court's order. - 7 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11684 WP No. 106565 of 2025
7. Petition stands dismissed at the admission stage. If the FDP Court finds that the subsequent documents were executed to defeat the decree, it is directed to take appropriate action against the concerned parties. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
VB CT:PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24