1 2025:CGHC:59492 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5814 of 2025 1. M.L. Verma (Motilal Verma) S/o Late Shri Hariram Verma Aged About 64 Years R/o Mig/11, Housing Board Colony, Patpar, Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar- Bhatapara (CG) ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chhattisgarh State Information Commission Through Its Chief Infromation Commissioner, Sector 19, North Block, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Special Secretary And First Appellat Authority School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar (Nava Raipur), Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Public Information Officer School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar (Nava Raipur), Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Varunendra Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No.1, 3 & 4 : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Shyam Sundar Tekchandani, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 08/12/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “(I) That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to decide the SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2025.12.09 19:24:52 +0530 2 appeal bearing Case No.A/1894/2024 expeditiously, in the interest of justice. (ii) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has submitted second appeal before respondent No.2 on 11.3.2024, however, till date appeal has not been decided and therefore, a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to consider and decide second appeal of petitioner within specified time. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 would submit that he is not having any objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. He, however, submits that as per instruction received by him, looking to pendency of cases before respondent No.2, second appeal of petitioner will be considered and decided within three months. 4. Heard learned counsel for respective parties. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing respondent No.2 to consider and decide pending second appeal of petitioner, which was filed on 11.3.2024, in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of the order. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-