IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition(T) No.63 of 2025 Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Murari Lal …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Anr. … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to implement/ execute the order/judgment dated 30.08.2024 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWPOA No.8929 of 2024 titled Murari Lal vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another, whereby petitioner herein was held entitled for regularization from the date of completion of one year contractual service after initial appointment with all consequential benefits from the due date. Since despite there being aforesaid direction, needful never came to be done at the behest of the respondents, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Before notices in the instant proceedings could be issued, Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, learned counsel representing the respondents states that mandate contained in the order/judgment sought to be complied with, has been partly complied with. He states that in terms of the order/judgment sought to be executed, services of the petitioner have been regularized and he has been paid enhanced salary. He states that arrears on account of regularization shall be paid within eight weeks. 3. While fairly acknowledging factum with regard to regularization of the petitioner as well as receipt of enhanced salary, learned counsel for the petitioner states that matter can be disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to pay the arrears within stipulated time. 4. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings and accordingly same are closed with a direction to the respondents to ensure that arrears, if any, are paid to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 03,2025 (shankar)