Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6038 (RAJ)

RAHUL KHAN S/O FAZRU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1833/2025 · 2025-03-12

Praveer Bhatnagar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11593] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1833/2025 Rahul Khan S/o Fazru Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Gorpahadi, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar. (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ankit Kumar for Mr. Kapil Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 12/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 27/2025 registered at Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2) of BNS and Sections 66-C and 66-D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:11593] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1833/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rahul Khan S/o Fazru Khan, in connection with FIR No. 27/2025 registered at Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/305