1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5728 of 2021 1 - Santosh Rai S/o Shri Asharam Rai Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kumhari, Tahsil Marwahi, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (Nrega) Vikas Bhawan, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 4 - Project Director (Pariyojna Nideshak) Zila Panchayat (Drda) District Gaurela-Pendra- Marwahi Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Marwahi, District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None, despite two calls. For Respondents/ State : Mr. Topilal Bareth, P. L. For Respondents No. 5 & 6 : Ms. Shrishti Shree Atal, Adv on behalf of Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Adv. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput) Order on Board 04/12/2025 1. Following relief(s) has been claimed in this writ petition:- PARUL MITTAL Digitally signed by PARUL MITTAL Date: 2025.12.05 11:01:09 +0530 2 10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/ direction/ order commanding the respondents to quash the advertisement dated 21.09.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the respondent No.4, so far as advertised post of “Peon” are concerned and mentioned at Sr. No.12 of such advertisement. 10.2 The Hon’ble Court be pleased to continue the petitioner on his post to meet the ends of justice. 10.3 Any other relief(s), which may deems fit, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may given to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the impugned advertisement dated 21.09.2021 has been canceled vide order dated 25.03.2022 the copy of the said order is filed as Annexure R-1. As the relief claimed by the petitioner has already been redressed, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Taking into consideration the submissions of State counsel on record as the impugned advertisement itself has been canceled, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. This writ petition thus disposed of. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Parul