RAJU YADAV ALIAS RAJU KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2254/2025 · 2025-04-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6037 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6037 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:10880]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A No.2254 of 2025
------
1. Raju Yadav @ Raju Kumar Yadav, aged about 28 years, Son of Late Manoj Yadav
2. Dilip Yadav @ Dilip Kumar Yadav, aged about 20 years, Son of Late Manoj Yadav All Resident of Village-Dharchanchi, P.O. & P.S.-Jamua, Dist.- Giridih
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Vijay Kumar Roy, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 09-04-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.210 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 75, 118(2), 109, 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners attempted to murder Sanichar Mahto and caused sexual harassment of his daughter-in- law. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are false. It is further submitted that there is admitted land dispute between the parties, hence with ulterior motive, this false case has been foisted. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are
directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.210 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/