TARANDEEP SINGH GAREWAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/28456/2025 · 2025-07-11
Manisha Batra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60352 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60352 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 309 CRM-M-28456-2025 Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 Tarandeep Singh Grewal and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA **** Present: Mr. Prashant Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vivek Sharma, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Jasman Singh Gill, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 & 3. **** MANISHA BATRA
, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No.104 dated 18.07.2018 registered under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, at Police Station Haibowal, Ludhiana, District Police Commissionerate and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 14.05.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 22.05.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana and got their statements NISHA 2025.07.15 11.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-28456-2025 -2- recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 05.07.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.104 dated 18.07.2018 registered under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, at Police Station Haibowal, Ludhiana, District Police Commissionerate and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 14.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners.
(MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE July 11, 2025 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2025.07.15 11.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document