DR SATYAVEER SINGH PINDAY v. State of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/15113/2024 · 2025-09-11
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60346 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60346 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15113 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Sri Rajat Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Narendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 and 3 and Sri B. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 20.08.2020, as well as entire proceeding of Case No.1280 of 2020(State Vs. Rohit Gill & Others), arising out of Case Crime No.357 of 2019, under sections 420, 406, IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Mathura, pending before learned A.C.J.M.-Ist, Mathura, on the basis of compromise. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party nos.2 and 3 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party nos.2 and 3, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 and 3 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajat Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Narendra Pal Singh Dr Satyaveer Singh Pinday .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party nos.2 and 3 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the charge sheet dated 20.08.2020, as well as entire proceeding of Case No.1280 of 2020(State Vs.
Rohit Gill & Others), arising out of Case Crime No.357 of 2019, under sections 420, 406, IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Mathura, pending before learned A.C.J.M.- Ist, Mathura, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. September 12, 2025 VKG A482 No. 15113 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad