CM-8982-CWP-2025 and CM-8983-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-17521-2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (107) CM-8982-CWP-2025 and CM-8983-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-17521-2021 Date of Decision : July 03, 2025 Saroj Bala .. Petitioner Versus House Allotment Committee, Chandigarh and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. C.P. Tiwana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the respondent-UT. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) CM-8982-CWP-2025 Present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 01 day in filing the restoration application. Keeping in view the facts mentioned in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and delay of 01 day in filing the restoration application is condoned. CM-8983-CWP-2025 Present application has been filed for recalling the order dated 04.03.2025, by which, the present writ petition was dismissed for non- prosecution. Notice of the application to the counsel opposite. Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He raises no objection for the HARSHA RANI 2025.07.04 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-8982-CWP-2025 and CM-8983-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-17521-2021 2 grant of prayer as raised in the present application. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The order dated 04.03.2025 is recalled and the writ petition is restored to its original number and status. CWP-17521-2021 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has surrendered the house in question but she was entitled for the allotment of another house which is not being considered hence, petitioner intends to file an application for allotment of an alternative accommodation. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case any representation/application is received from the petitioner for the allotment of any other house, the said representation will be considered in accordance with law from the rules governing the allotment of houses and appropriate order will be passed within a period of eight weeks and in case the claim of the petitioner is found to be covered within rules, the same will be accepted otherwise due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order to be passed for not accepting the claim of the petitioner for her information and necessary action. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation with the respondents. HARSHA RANI 2025.07.04 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-8982-CWP-2025 and CM-8983-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-17521-2021 3 4. Ordered accordingly. July 03, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.07.04 09:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document