212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Union of India and others Ramnish Verma and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR Present: None. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. No one appears on behalf of the 2. It appears that the Union of India is not interested in arguing its cases as even in earlier cases, we find that the counsel is not a Union of India. 3. Dismissed for non 4. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. 02.07.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12713-2017 Date of Decision: Union of India and others Vs. Ramnish Verma and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA None. *** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the Union of India is not interested in arguing its cases as even in earlier cases, we find that the counsel is not a Union of India. Dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.07.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA . JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) petitioners. It appears that the Union of India is not interested in arguing its cases as even in earlier cases, we find that the counsel is not appearing for All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No It appears that the Union of India is not interested in arguing its ppearing for RAJESH KUMAR 2025.07.04 12:08 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.