(1) 917.apl.1333.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1333 OF 2025 Nilesh s/o Sajjan Singh and others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Wadi Nagpur and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A. S. Shukla, Advocate for applicants. Mr. M. J. Khan, APP for non-applicant No.1/State. Mr. S. K. Bhandarkar, Advocate for non-applicant No.2. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : 18/11/2025 1. Vide order dated 29.09.2025, the First Information Report in question was quashed, subject to the payment of costs of Rs.25,000/- by the applicants and Rs.25,000/- by the non-applicant No.2. The office note shows that the payment of costs has not been paid, however, Mr. Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants has tendered across the bar a Pursis along with a receipt evidencing payment of costs of Rs.25,000/- as per the order of this Court. The Pursis is taken on record. 2. Mr. Bhandarkar, learned counsel for the non-applicant No.2 also makes a statement that the costs has been paid and he undertakes to file a Pursis during the course of the day. The statement is accepted. 3. In that view of the matter, no further orders are necessary. (NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J) Sarkate