Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6034 (PNJ)

RENU GARG v. CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE, CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND OTHERS

COCP/4233/2025 · 2026-03-12

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 211-IV Renu Garg Chander Panchkula CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Division Kumar vs. “Keeping i the land o executing c any coerci depositing accept the COCP-4233-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.4233 o Date of decision Garg Versus nder Shekhar Khare, IAS, Chief hkula, Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Varun Gupta, Advocate fo Mr. Kuldeep Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nitin Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Ad for the respondents-HSVP. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of interim order dated 14.2.2022 Bench of this Court in CWP-203 ar vs. State of Haryana and others”, w ing in view of above detailed propos d owners, a direction is being give ing courts in the State of Haryana oercive steps as the respondents ting the compensation amount and the compensation as per the ab 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 4233 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-12.03.2026 …..Petitioner Chief Administrator, HSVP, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA cate for vocate ate for ill, Advocate ition has been filed alleging .2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by 20384-2021 titled as “Pradeep , whereby it was directed that oposed plan and the interest of given in this case that all the ana are restrained from taking nts have carved out plan for and the reference courts will e above said proposed plan. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Learned c publication compensati be awared schedule st comply an proposed p the petition 1) has bee payment ha in the prese the petition March 12 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-4233-2025 (O & M) d counsel for respondent-HSVP ation will be done with respect to p nsation in the entire State of Haryan ared with respect to deposit of le stated above. A direction is being y and make the payment in accord ed plan/priority list…..” At the very outset, it is submi etitioner that the Writ Court order dat as been complied with by the resp ent has been made to the petitioner e present contempt petition and the sam In view of the submissions m etitioner, the present contempt petition Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 2, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 VP further informs that due to proposed plan of depositing aryana so that land owners can of compensation as per the eing given to the respondents to cordance with the above said submitted by learned counsel for er dated 14.2.2022 (Annexure P- e respondents-authority and the ioner, therefore, nothing survives the same may be disposed of. ons made by learned counsel for etition is disposed of. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document