Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93267-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16694 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajiv Kumar Dutta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurodh Tripathi,Pulak Ganguly Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sushil Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner seeks a direction to quash the recovery notice No.E.D.D.)(P) 2609 dated 22.02.2023 issued by respondent no.5. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the inaction on part of the said respondent authority in deciding the representation dated
22.02.2025.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.5 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent no.5/Executive Engineer, Vidyut Vitran Khand-II, Pipri, Sonbhadra, is directed to pass a reasoned
order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from date, after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Shahroz (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad