Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60291 (PNJ)

KESHAV BHARTI ALIAS RAHUL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/27980/2025 · 2025-09-09

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-27980-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 CRM-M-27980-2025 Date of decision: 09.09.2025 KESHAV BHARTI ALIAS RAHUL ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. S.K. Passi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH. J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C has been filed for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.124 dated 26.08.2023, under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, 1985, and later on added Section 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Sadar Raikot, District Ludhiana, Punjab. 2. As per prosecution it is a case of heavy recovery of tramadol tablets i.e. 24,400 capsules from both the accused, including the petitioner. 3. It is informed that Keshav Bharti @ Rahul is resident of Indra Colony, Baghpat Road, Meerut, District Meerut. Out of total 11 prosecution witnesses, only 04 have been examined till date. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and noticing the severity of the incident, this Court deems it appropriate, if the trial be concluded finally. 5. Accordingly learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of 06 months. 6. Petition stands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 09.09.2025 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.09.10 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment