Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60278 (ALL)

RAJENDRA v. SANJAY BUDHIYA

CRLRD/1635/2023 · 2025-07-01

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:102593 Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1635 of 2023 Revisionist :- Rajendra Opposite Party :- Sanjay Budhiya Counsel for Revisionist :- Avneesh Tripathi,Raghwendra Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Santosh Kumar Singh Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. Order on Crl. Misc. Delay Condonation Application 1. None appeared on behalf of the revisionist. However, Sri Vivek Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1 and Sri Pradeep Kumar learned AGA are present. 2. The instant revision is time barred by 156 days and ground taken in the delay condonation application appears to be vague and there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay in filing the instant revision. 3. Accordingly, the instant delay condonation application filed by the revisionist is hereby dismissed. Order on Crl. Revision 4. As delay condonation application filed by the revisionist has already been dismissed, therefore, the instant revision also, stands, dismissed being time barred. Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Ankita Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad