Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60253 (PNJ)

JYOTI MIGLANI v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/30413/2024 · 2025-05-21

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION : 21.05.2025 CRM-M-30413-2024 (O&M) JYOTI MIGLANI ... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CRM-M-31664-2024 (O&M) KRISHAN LAL MIGLANI ... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Sagar Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the complainant. * * * RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.107, dated 04.06.2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 201 IPC, registered at Police Station City Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. While granting interim protection, vide order dated 24.06.2024 the petitioner in CRM-M-30413-2024 and vide order dated 03.12.2024 the petitioner in CRM-M-31664-2024 were directed to join investigation Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that pursuant to order dated 24.06.2024 in CRM-M-30413-2024 and order dated 03.12.2024 in CRM-M-31664-2024, petitioners have joined the investigation and as such their interim bail may be made absolute. He submits that the original transfer deed is lost, however, he has photocopy of the same and it has been produced before the Police. He submits that the report regarding the lost copy of the transfer deed is also registered. JANKI BHATT 2025.05.23 20:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-30413-2024 (O&M) & -2- CRM-M-31664-2024 (O&M) Learned counsel for the complainant opposes the same and submits that petitioner is intentionally not handing over the original transfer deed as he is the beneficiary. Learned State counsel has also opposed the bail applications, however, on instructions from SI Krishan, affirmed the fact that the petitioners have joined the investigation. It is apparent that the petitioners have joined the investigation and the only dispute is regarding the recovery of original copy of the transfer deed. The petitioner, has however, given the photocopy of the same. The allegations and counter-allegations of the parties are a matter of trial. The petitioners have joined the investigation pursuant to order dated 24.06.2024 in CRM-M-30413-2024 and order dated 03.12.2024 in CRM-M-31664-2024. Accordingly, the interim order dated 24.06.2024 in CRM-M- 30413-2024 and order dated 03.12.2024 in CRM-M-31664-2024 are made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petitions stand allowed. 21.05.2025 (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) Janki JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.05.23 20:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh