Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60248 (MAD)

Hakuna Matata Solutions Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner (ST)

WP/19035/2025 · 2025-05-22

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.19035 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.05.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.No.19035 of 2025 M/s.Hakuna Matata Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Director, Gengarajan PV No.51 Tower C, Third Floor, TEK Meadows Rajiv Gandhi Salai Chennai – 600 119. .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) GST-Appeal, Chennai (II) Main Building, 2nd Floor, Greams Road Chennai – 600 006. 2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Kelambakkam Assessment Circle No.46, Room No.119, 1st Floor Mylapore Taluk Office Building Greenways Road, Chennai – 600 028. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to the impugned order bearing RC No.958/2025/A1 dated 17.04.2025 and quash the same. For the Petitioner : Mr.J.B.Aadeish For the Respondents : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate (Tax) for R1 and R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19035 of 2025 ORDER Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner suffered an ex-parte order under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, at the hands of the second respondent. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner filed an appeal before the first respondent. While filing the appeal, the petitioner deposited 10% of the tax amount, but the appeal was filed beyond the condonable period. Therefore, the Appellate Authority rightly dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. Challenging the same, this writ petition came to be filed. 3. The order passed by the Appellate Authority cannot be faulted, however, taking into account the special facts and circumstances of the case and recording the undertaking of the petitioner to pay a further 15% of the tax amount to the second respondent, the impugned order in the writ petition is set aside. 4. The petitioner undertakes to pay a further 15% of the tax amount on or before 06.06.2025. Upon payment of the said amount, the attachment of the petitioner's bank account will stand lifted and only in that event, the order passed by the Appellate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19035 of 2025 Authority and the Assessing Authority would stand set aside and the matter would be remitted back to the file of the second respondent. 5. The petitioner shall appear before the second respondent on 13.06.2025 at 04:00 p.m. and place all the relevant materials before the second respondent and the second respondent will peruse the same and after hearing the petitioner, shall pass orders afresh on merits and in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that on failure of compliance of the aforementioned conditions by the petitioner, the benefit of the present order shall automatically stand vacated without any further reference to this Court. 7. The writ petition, accordingly, stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.21328 and 21332 of 2025 are closed. 22.05.2025 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes/No Index: Yes/No drm/jeni https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19035 of 2025 To: 1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) GST-Appeal, Chennai (II) Main Building, 2nd Floor, Greams Road Chennai – 600 006. 2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Kelambakkam Assessment Circle No.46, Room No.119, 1st Floor Mylapore Taluk Office Building Greenways Road, Chennai – 600 028. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.19035 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN , J. (drm/jeni) W.P.No.19035 of 2025 22.05.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis