- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15962 MFA No. 101491 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 101491 OF 2015 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. VISHWANATH SADASHIV TANGADI, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: GOUNDI, R/O: CHIKKATTI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. ARCHANA A. MAGADUM, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. BHUPAL RAYAPPA MORAB AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MAHISHWADAGI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 2. SRI. NINGAPPA DHAREPPA HIPPARAGI AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MAHISHWADAGI, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., KATAGI BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, KACHERI ROAD, JAMKHANDI-587301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.S. JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3; NOTICE TO R1 & R2 SERVED) GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15962 MFA No. 101491 of 2015 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MVC ACT PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ATHANI IN MVC NO.135/2013 DATED 02.07.2014 AND AWARD THE COMPENSATION AS PRAYED FOR IN THE CLAIM PETITION, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) No representation on appellant’s side on call. 2. On 12.11.2025, following order was passed: “No representation on appellant’s side on call. Sri S.S.Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.3 is present. On 08.10.2025 learned counsel for the appellant sought time and accordingly time was granted. However, on this day there is no representation. Therefore list the matter on 20.11.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15962 MFA No. 101491 of 2015 3. The appellant did not choose to represent the matter even on passing the aforementioned order. Therefore, it is clear that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE RH CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15