Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010010722020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/358/2020 MADHUSUDHAN BAISHYA S/O SARBESWAR BAISHYA, R/O HOUSE NO. 6, JYOTI PATH, GEETANAGAR, GUWAHATI-781024, DIST-KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REP, BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, WILDLIFE AND CHIEF WIDLIFE WARDEN, ASSAM, ARANYA BHAWAN, PANJABARI GUWAHAT-781037, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM 2:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI-781005 ASSAM 3:THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE NEW DELHI PIN-110001 4:THE CENTRAL ZOO AUTHORITY REP. BY THE MEMBER SECRETARY B1 WING 6TH FLOOR PT. DEENDAYAL ANTYODAYA BHAWAN CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-11000 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY, MR. M SARMA,MR P BHARDWAJ Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MR H GUPTA,SC, FOREST BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 20/08/2025 Mr. P Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions submits that the issue raised in the present proceeding would no longer require an adjudication, inasmuch as, the same has become infructuous. He prays that the matter be dismissed as having become infructuous. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant