1 2025:CGHC:56666 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 122 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sadhna Devi W/o Ganeshram, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Naraibod , Gevra Bastin, Ward No.57, Police Station And Tahsil Katghora, Civil And Revenue District Korba (C.G.). At present R/o. Type-A, Sector -4- 436 Balco Nagar, Tahsil And District Korba (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Anita Rathore W/o Rameshwar Prasad Rathore Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Naraibod Gevra Basti, Ward No. 57, Police Station And Tahsil Katghora, Civil And Revenue District Korba (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its Managing Director, S.E.C.L. Gevra Project, Tahsil-Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) 2 - General Manager S.E.C.L. Gevra Area Project Gevera, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba C.G. 3 - Collector, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer(Revenue) /land Acquisition Officer, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. Abhinav Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondent No.1 & 2 : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate For Respondents/State No.3 & 4 : Mr. Anurag Tripathi, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 20/11/2025 1. Grievance raised by the petitioners in this writ petition is that the petitioner No.1 has purchased the land land bearing part of Kh. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.26 10:45:21 +0530 2 No.436/4, vide registered sale deed dated 28.11.2010 and petitioner No.2 has purchased the land bearing part of Khasra No.436/4, area 0.081 hectare, situated at Village Naraibodh, Korba, Ward No.57, P.C. No.75, R.I. Circle Deepka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba, which was acquired by the respondent- SECL, however, it was not used by the respondents No.1 and 2/SECL. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make a representation before respondents No. 1 & 2 for redressal of their grievance. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 & 2. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty with the petitioners to submit representation before respondents No. 1 & 2 and if such representation is submitted by the petitioners, respondents No. 1 & 2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously. 5. With the aforementioned observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram