DHARMENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIB/1952/2025 · 2025-05-16
Chandra Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60128 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:82223 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1952 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Saroj,Raj Ashwani,Ranjit Pratap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1. Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar Saroj, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Jaunpur/ Respondent no.2 to decide the recall/ restoration application dated 14.8.2013 filed in appeal No. 1153/1481 of 1983 (Kedarnath Vs. Harishankar) and appeal No. 86 of 1993 (Harishankar Vs. Gaon Sabha) under Section 11 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 pending in the Court of Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Jaunpur/ respondent no.2 within a specific period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that restoration application filed on behalf of the petitioners is pending before respondent no.2. He submitted that appropriate direction be issued for expeditious disposal of restoration application within time bound period.
4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
5. There is no dispute about the fact that restoration application filed by petitioners is time barred.
6. No case for expeditious disposal of time barred proceeding is made out. Writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 17.5.2025 Vandana Y. Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad