Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60123 (CHH)

K. RAMA YASHWANT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/6146/2025 · 2025-12-01

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:58276 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6146 of 2025 1 - K. Rama Yashwant S/o K. Narsingh Aged About 49 Years O/o Principal, Government Higher Secondary School Arrabor- Sukma, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Tribal Research And Training Institute, Sector-24, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Bijapur, District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Sukma, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh 6 - Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development Department Through Collector- Bijapur, District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Tribal And Scheduled Caste Development Department Through , Collector- Sukma, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh 8 - Assistant Commissioner Cum Member / Secretary District Level Certificate Verification Committee, District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 2 9 - Office Of The Research Officer Tribal Research And Training Institute, Regional Unit, Jagdalpur, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 10 - Salvam Rajrao Village- Phandiguda, Post- Injaram, Tehsil- Konta, District : Sukuma, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Anurag Tripathi, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 02/12/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):- “10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records from the respondents. 10.2 Alternatively, the Hon’ble Court may kindly pass an order for the respondents that thepetitioner should not be called for verification of caste certificate till the ethnographic study of Mannewar (Mannepod) Scheduled Caste in Bastar Division of Chhattisgarh and caste exper is appointed in Bijapur district; 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief or pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition as this stage, with liberty to file better constituted petition. 3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY