Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60116 (PNJ)

HARPAL SINGH v. SH. RAVI BHAGAT, IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/2532/2025 · 2025-08-18

Vikas Bahl

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-2532-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (103) COCP-2532-2025 Date of decision: - 18.08.2025 Harpal Singh ....Petitioner Versus Ravi Bhagat and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. Mr. I.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present contempt petition has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for the willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 13.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 2. Compliance affidavit report has been filed on behalf of respondent No.4 and reply by way of affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No.5, today in the Court and the same are taken on record. Copies thereof have been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner. NARESH KUMAR 2025.08.18 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement COCP-2532-2025 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted that the present contempt petition was filed against an interim order passed in CWP-30574-2024 and since the main writ petition itself has been decided on 23.07.2025, thus, the present contempt petition be disposed of, at this stage, as having been rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of, at this stage, as having been rendered infructuous. ( VIKAS BAHL ) August 18, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.08.18 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement