HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2622 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 are present. Learned AGA is also present. 2. Vide order dated 19.8.2025 passed by this Court, opposite party no. 2 was directed to explain the payment of remaining amount of Rs. 5,000/-. Since the amount of Rs. 5,000/- has already been received by opposite party no. 2 from the revisionist herein and it was only the question of payment of balance amount of Rs. 5,000/-, learned counsel for revisionist submitted that he has received demand draft from his client drawn on the Union Bank of India, bearing No. 436502, dated 9.9.2025 and submitted that the said demand draft of Rs. 5000/- has been accepted by opposite party no. 2, which is drawn in the name of Resatal Rubi. 3. The entire controversy has come to an end and the said fact is not denied by learned counsel for opposite party no. 2. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 undertakes to hand over the said demand draft to his client Resatal Rubi within ten days. 5. The present revision stands disposed of. September 10, 2025 HR Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ajay Kumar Giri, Satyendra Narayan Singh, Surendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. (Harvir Singh,J.) Omprakash Chaubey .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- HEMANT RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad