Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6011 (AP)

M/s Gayatri Constructions v. The Union of India

WP/3798/2021 · 2025-03-07

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010054112021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3798/2021 Between: 1. M/S GAYATRI CONSTRUCTIONS,, R/P BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. LAXMAN RAO MALLADI. AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O H. NO. 7-18-18, MAHBOOBNAGARPETA, GUNTUR- 522002 ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, RAIL NILAYAM, III FLOOR, SEUNDERABAD. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF ENGINEER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, SECUNDERABAD. 3. THE SR DIVISONAL ENGINEER, (CENTRAL), SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents not to proceed with the letter vide Lr No. B/W.148/1/9793/WA.0 dated 9-12-2020 issued by respondent No.3 which is against to principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution and Clause No.62 of General Conditions of Contract and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings of alleged termination of existing agreement pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMANCHI VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MANNAVA APARAJITHA(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. .... The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Sri Somanchi Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 07.03.2025 SNI 3 129 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.3798 OF 2021 Dated: 07.03.2025 SNI