SUBA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/5217/2025 · 2025-05-20
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60108 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60108 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
106
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5217-2025 DECIDED ON: 20.05.2025
SUBA SINGH AND ANOTHER
.....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Himanshu Setia, Advocate for Mr. Kushager Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, who informs the Court that the concerned officer is currently conducting an inquiry into the matter, and in all probability, an appropriate speaking order will be passed by today’s evening. In light of the assurance given by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further and prays for withdrawal of the same.
POONAM NEGI 2025.05.21 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5217-2025 -2- Prayer is accepted. The present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 20.05.2025
JUDGE Poonam Negi Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No POONAM NEGI 2025.05.21 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document