Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60102 (PNJ)

KULDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/12399/2017 · 2025-08-20

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 204 Kuldeep Singh and others State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. the claim of the petitioners in the light of the judgment rendered in a batch of State of Punjab an manner. 2. on instructions, states that having a relook at the matter, taking note of the afore within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 3. 4. 20.08.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kuldeep Singh and others Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Fateh Singh Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. None for respondents no.5 to 10. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel makes a limited prayer the claim of the petitioners in the light of the judgment in a batch of appeals with the lead case State of Punjab and another vs. Karamjeet Kaur To the aforesaid, learned State counsel on instructions, states that respondents No.2 and ng a relook at the matter, taking note of the afore within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. The aforesaid satisfies the learned c Disposed of accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12399-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 20.08.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. None for respondents no.5 to 10. makes a limited prayer for consideration of the claim of the petitioners in the light of the judgment dated 09.04.2025 appeals with the lead case being LPA-1843-2019, d another vs. Karamjeet Kaur, in a time bound To the aforesaid, learned State counsel has no objection and, respondents No.2 and 3 would not be averse to ng a relook at the matter, taking note of the afore-referred judgment, within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. the learned counsel for the petitioners. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.21 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.