M/S BHAGAWAN MET PRIVATE LTD AND ANR v. THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD AND 3 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/155/2025 · 2025-04-06
N Unni Krishnan Nair
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6008 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6008 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010010552025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/155/2025 1: M/S BHAGAWAN MET PRIVATE LTD AND ANR REGISTERED OFFICE AT 105, B.R. TOWER, 21 JANA PATH LANE, ULUBARI, P.O. GUWAHATI - 781007, DIST. KAMRUP M, ASSAM, REP. BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTORS SRI BINOD KEYAL, SON OF SRI SRI LAL KEYAL.
2: SRI BINOD KEYAL S/O LT. S.L. KEYAL R/O KESHAV KUNJ SONI RAM BORA ROAD ULUBARI P.O. GUWAHATI - 781007 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM VERSUS 1: THE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD AND 3 ORS REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTAN BAZAR, P.O. GUWAHATI - 781001, DIST. KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM.
2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER DISTRIBUTION LOWER ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001.
3:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER SONAPUR SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICE SONAPUR ASSAM.
4:THE FREDER MAINTENANCE ENGINEER SONAPUR ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION APDCL LAR SONAPUR ASSAM For the Applicant(s) : Mr. P. Sarma, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Choudhury, Standing Counsel, APDCL for all the respondents.
Page No.# 2/2 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR 07.04.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) The matter comes upon for consideration of the application preferred on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to condone the delay of 2(two) days in filing the connected appeal. The application is not seriously opposed by Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, APDCL appearing for all the respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the applicants and after going through the contents of the interlocutory application, we are of the view that the delay of 2(two) days in filing the connected writ appeal is liable to be condoned. Hence, the interlocutory application is allowed. The delay of 2(two) days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal immediately.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant