Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60074 (CAL)

PARITOSH PRAMANIK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/30951/2024 · 2025-11-04

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

04.11.2025 23 sdas WPA 30951 of 2024 Paritosh Pramanik Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Bapin Baidya Mr. Sandipan Maity …. for the petitioner Mr. Ashim Kumar Ganguly, learned AGP Mr. Tarak Karan .…for the State Mr. Raja Saha Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee …. for the respondent no. 2 1. Mr. Baidya, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that a reply has been received to the notice under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, after filing of the writ petition. The writ petition has, therefore, become infructuous. 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 3. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 4. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)