1 2025:CGHC:58192 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5808 of 2025 1 - Hema Pandey W/o Chavi Pandey Aged About 36 Years R/o Rahas Beda, Village- Kotmi-Sonar, Post- Kotmi-Sonar, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Mines And Minerals Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Directorate Of Geology And Mining, Indrawati Bhawan, Block- Iv Floor 1 And 2, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Deputy Director (Mining) Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Collector Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Mining Officer Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 01/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that subsequent to filing of writ petition, as per Chhattisgargh Minor Mineral Ordinary Sand (Quary and Trade) Rules, 2025, supplementary lease agreement has been executed on 12.11.2025, therefore, at this stage, petitioner is not pressing Relief No.10.1 and also the writ petition on merits. He however, submits that petitioner has already submitted a BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.03 10:57:17 +0530 2 representation vide Annexure P-7 and Annexure P-9, which is pending consideration before respondent No.4, therefore, a direction be issued to respondent No.4 to take decision on the pending representation. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to respondent No.4 to take decision on the pending representation, he is having no objection. 3. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to take decision on the pending representation (Annexure P-7 and Annexure P-9) submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram