Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60059 (PNJ)

GURMEET SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

CWP/15238/2025 · 2025-07-09

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-15238-2025 (O&M) 139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Gurmeet Singh Union of India CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of Sher-E-Punjab Dal with the Election Commission of India in a time bound manner. 2. L be granted liberty to redressal of his 3. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are r 4. Without commenting on disposed of with a respondent No. 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Gurmeet Singh versus Union of India and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing respondents Punjab Dal with the Election Commission of India in a time bound Learned counsel for the petitioner be granted liberty to make a representation his grievance, and the same may be Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. Without commenting on the merits of the case disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to respondent No.2, for redressal of his grievance, and 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15238-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 09, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ directing respondents No.1 and 2 to register the Punjab Dal with the Election Commission of India in a time bound petitioner submits that the petitioner may resentation before respondent No.2, for and the same may be decided, expeditiously. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or merits of the case, the petition is liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before grievance, and respondent No.2 shall 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ No.1 and 2 to register the Punjab Dal with the Election Commission of India in a time bound may , for Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or the petition is make a representation before shall MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.14 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-15238-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 consider such representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE July 09, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.14 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment