SHRI LAXMIKANT S/O GUNAWANT YALLARI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.A/100615/2025 · 2025-11-26
S Rachaiah
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60059 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60059 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16431 CRL.A No. 100615 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100615 OF 2025 (U/S 14 A(2) of SC and ST ACT) BETWEEN:
SHRI LAXMIKANT S/O. GUNAWANT YALLARI, AGE ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. GOKAK ROAD, NEAR 1ST BUS STOP, TALUKA. MUCHANDI, DISTRICT. BELAGAVI-590016. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRASHANT F.GOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, PSI, SHAHAPUR PS BELAGAVI, R/BY HCGP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580011.
2.
SMT. LAXMI W/O. RAJU POL, AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. BASAVAN GALLI, BELAGAVI-590003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP FOR R1;
MRS. N.S. PATTAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14 A(2) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT 1989, PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.03.2025 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, BELAGAVI IN CRL.MISC.294/2025 IN CRIME NO.47/2021 BEFORE SHAHAPUR POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 498(A), 302, 504 R/W 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE AND SECTION 3(2)(V), 3(2)(VA) AND SECTION 3(1)(S) OF SCHEDULE CASTE AND SCHEDULE TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 AND GRANT BAIL TO THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 HEREIN AND ETC.,.
Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16431 CRL.A No. 100615 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH)
1. Pursuant to the order dated 25.11.2025 of this Court, the Jail Superintendent, Belagavi, is present before this Court.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that, as this is a successive bail application, the appeal may be allowed on medical grounds.
3. On perusal of the medical certificate issued by the Jail Authorities, I am of the considered opinion that, no sufficient grounds are made out to allow the appeal. Hence, the appeal stands rejected. Sd/- (S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE
SMM/CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4