RTE group (907, 925, 954 to 956 and p1 to p6).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 WRIT PETITION NO.12445 OF 2025 Apeksha Shaikshanik Sansthas Ajinkya English Medium School And Junior College And Anr VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others ... Mr. Prashant R. Nangare, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4. Mr. Rajesh H. Mewara, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.2. Mr. Satish B. Parnere, Advocate for Respondent No.5. … AND 925 WRIT PETITION NO.13665 OF 2025 Shri Bhaskarachrya Pratishthan Aurangabad Through Its President VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Pramod D. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent No.5. … AND 954 WRIT PETITION NO.13712 OF 2025 Shantiniketan Public School Marathi Semi Marathi Medium Malegaon Thr Its Principal R D More VERSUS The Union Of India Thr Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajesh H. Mewara, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Ms. Yogita Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.5. … AND 955 WRIT PETITION NO.13713 OF 2025 Shantiniketan Public School Marathi Semi Marathi Medium Malegaon Thr Its Principal R.d. More VERSUS The Union Of India Thr Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajesh H. Mewara, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Ms. Yogita Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.5. … AND 956 WRIT PETITION NO. 13714 OF 2025 Godavari Public School English Medium Thr Its Principal G.h. Torne VERSUS The Union Of India Thr Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Vinod P. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Nitin Salunke, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.1. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. Ms. Yogita Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.5. [1] RTE group (907, 925, 954 to 956 and p1 to p6).odt … AND 1 WRIT PETITION NO.13775 OF 2025 Swami Vivekanand Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its President And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Ashish P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3/State. Mr. N. U. Yadav, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.2. Mr. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. … AND 2 WRIT PETITION NO.13776 OF 2025 Saraswati Shaikshanik Sanskurtik Vikas Mandal Through Its Chairman And Anr VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Shailesh S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. K. Tambe,AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. … AND 3 WRIT PETITION NO.13777 OF 2025 Shri Ramrao Naik Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha Through Its Secretary And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Ashish P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3/State. Mr. Bhaskar Dhonde, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.2. Mr. A. R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. … AND 4 WRIT PETITION NO.13778 OF 2025 Saraswati Shaikshanik Sanskurtik Vikas Mandal Through Its Chairman And Anr VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Shailesh S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms. S. S. Joshi, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr. S. R. Dheple, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. … AND 5 WRIT PETITION NO.13779 OF 2025 Rajarshri Shahu Maharaj Gramin Yuva Vikas Pratishthans Through Its Chairman VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Prashant R. Nangare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4/State. Mr. Nitin Salunke, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.2. Mr. S. B. Parnere, Advocate for Respondent No.5. … AND 6 WRIT PETITION NO.13780 OF 2025 [2] RTE group (907, 925, 954 to 956 and p1 to p6).odt Yashwant Bahuuddeshya Sevabhavi Sanstha And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Ashish P. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 3/State. Mr. Nitin Salunke, Central Government Counsel for Respondent No.2. Mr. A. R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. … CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 18 NOVEMBER 2025 ORDER : . All these are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the respective petitioners/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 2. We have heard both the sides. 3. We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners’ proposals independently on their own merits and take appropriate decisions as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if they are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to them within a period of four weeks thereafter. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [3]