Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60046 (PNJ)

BALBIR CHAND v. NEELAM RANI

FAO-M/40/2021 · 2025-07-30

Deepinder Singh Nalwa, Gurvinder Singh Gill

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 225 IOIN-1-FAO-M-40-2021 in/and FAO-M-40-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.07.2025 BALBIR CHAND ...Appellant VERSUS NEELAM RANI ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: None for the applicant-appellant. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL , J.(Oral) 1. The present application (IOIN-1-FAO-M-40-2021) has been filed by the Registry on the ground that the service of respondent is incomplete for want of process fee. 2. Office has reported that despite the counsel for the appellant having been requested several times for depositing of the process fee, the needful has not been done and, consequently, the service remains incomplete. 3. Even today none has put in appearance on behalf of appellant. 4. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances, the main appeal which stands admitted is taken on board and the same is dismissed for non-prosecution. (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) JUDGE (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) 30.07.2025 JUDGE Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RIMPAL RANI 2025.08.01 16.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document