RAVINDER v. PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT AND ANOTHER
CWP/14302/2021 · 2025-05-21
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60024 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 60024 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 CWP-14302-2021 (O&M) Decided on : 21.05.2025 RAVINDER ..PETITIONER Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT, PANIPAT AND ANR
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mr. Aman Nain, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for both the parties submits that the issue raised in the present petition has already been answered by this Court while passing order in bunch of petitions including CWP-14258-2021 titled as ‘Deepak versus Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Panipat and another, alongwith other connected cases, decided on 07.05.2025, hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of in the same terms and conditions as held in CWP-14258-2021- Deepak's case (supra).
2. Keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for both RIYA 2025.05.22 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-14302-2021 (O&M)
-2- the parties recorded herein above, the present petition is dismissed in the same terms and conditions as held in CWP-14258-2021- Deepak's case (supra).
3. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 21.05.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.05.22 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document