Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60024 (KAR)

SRI.NOORMOHAMMAD A KHAJI v. SRI.D.BASAVARAJ

CCC/100235/2024 · 2025-11-06

Geetha K B, S G Pandit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15158-DB CCC No. 100235 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100235 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. NOORMOHAMMAD A. KHAJI, AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.WARD NO.10, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, NEAR LAXMI TEMPLE, BAGALKOT-587101. …COMPLAINANT (BY Ms. GAYATRI S.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. D. BASAVARAJ, AGE. MAJOR, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOT-587 103. 2. SRI. PRASHANTH BARIGIDAD, AGE. MAJOR, THE REHABILITATION OFFICER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOT-587 103. …ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU-560 001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR RESPONDENT) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1950, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE CONTEMPT PETITION AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 26-09-2023, PASSED IN WP Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.11.13 11:16:52 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15158-DB CCC No. 100235 of 2024 NO.103985/2023 (GM-RES), PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Learned counsel for the complainant Ms. Gayatri S.R., files a memo, dated 06.11.2025, stating that an endorsement, dated 10.10.2024, has been issued in pursuance of the directions issued by this Court in W.P. No.103985/2023, vide order dated 26.09.2023 and therefore, the complainant may be permitted to withdraw the contempt petition with liberty to challenge the endorsement. Memo is placed on record. The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE KMS, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4