Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60008 (ALL)

SUNEETA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/7379/2025 · 2025-05-25

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88841 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7379 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suneeta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Munna Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the respondents by not offering appointment to her despite the fact that she stood selected as anganbadi worker. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner himself has stated vide paragraph 10 that her income certificate has been cancelled and in such circumstances, he cannot be offered appointment. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy before appropriate remedy. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to avail the remedy available to her against the order cancelling the income certificate. Since petitioner has not been offered appointment as anganbadi worker for her income certificate being cancelled by the competent authority, it is always open for the petitioner to file appeal under relevant rules. 6. Subject to the aforesaid liberty, this petition stands consigned to records. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad