Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 60007 (PNJ)

NEERU KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/28360/2025 · 2025-05-26

Sanjiv Berry

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

145 CRM-M-28360-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28360-2025 Date of decision: 26.05.2025 NEERU KAUR ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Ms. G.K. Hundal, Advocate for Mr. R.D. Rattewal, Advocate Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jatinderpal Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab. ..… SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) Instant petition under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 has been filed for directions to official respondents to investigate the case in a fair and proper manner arising out of the FIR (Annexure P-1) as under: FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 19 22.02.2025 125 BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act. (Sections 105, 303(2), 317(2) BNS and Sections 25(9), 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act added later on and Sections 238, 61(2) BNS and Section 25 of Arms Act deleted later on). Goraya, District Jalandhar (Rural). 2. At the very outset, learned State counsel has pointed out that after completion of the investigation challan has been presented before the learned Illaqa Magistrate on 28.04.2025. Puneet Sharma 2025.05.28 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 145 CRM-M-28360-2025 -2- 3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to avail appropriate efficacious remedy available to the petitioner by moving appropriate application in accordance with law before the learned Trial Court. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with aforesaid liberty. (SANJIV BERRY) 26.05.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.05.28 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment