HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 2372 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset Shri Ram Chandra Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner states that the recovery certificate has been withdrawn, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2025 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Omraj Singh, Ram Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Satendra Singh (Contractor) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad