APHC010053562019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2468/2019 Between: 1. K SATYANRAYANA, S/O DEMUDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, ADVOCATE, R/O SIVAPURAM, NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS, REP., BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY THE SECRETARY LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTIONS, ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA 4. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 5. THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE, NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. T GANGA RAJU, ADVOCATE, NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. M SIVA KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.2468 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in appointing the 6th respondent as Additional Public Prosecutor to the Assistant Sessions Court, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District as arbitrary, illegal, null and void and contrary to the G.O.Ms. No. 187, Law Department, dated 6.12.2000 and to set aside the same and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 01.08.2025 Pmk 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:2468 OF 2019 Date: 01.08.2025 Pmk