SRI YUVRAJ S/O ASHOK KHOT v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/103765/2024 · 2025-09-24
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59998 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59998 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13114 WP No. 103765 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103765 OF 2024 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. YUVRAJ S/O. ASHOK KHOT AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. GAYAKAWADI, HAMLET OF KODNI-591237, TQ: NIPPANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALAGOUDA A.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BELAGAVI-590001, DIST: BELAGAVI.
2.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI-590001.
3.
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUKA PANCHAYAT OFFICE, NIPPANI-591237, TQ: NIPPANI,
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13114 WP No. 103765 of 2024
DIST: BELAGAVI.
4.
PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER GRAM PANCHAYAT, GAYAKAWADI, R/O. GAYAKAWADI, HAMLET OF KODNI-591237, TQ: NIPPANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
5.
SMT. YALLAVVA PUNDLIK NAIK AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. GAYAKAWADI, HAMLET OF KODNI-591237, TQ: NIPPANI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE SANCTION LETTER OF HOUSE CONSTRUCTION UNDER GOVERNMENT SCHEME BEARING BENEFICIARY CODE NO. 65639 IN GRAM PANCHAYAT, KODANI, TALUKA. NIPPANI, DIST. BELAGAVI GRANTED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 4 IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT NO.5, PRODUCED AS PER ANNEXURE-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13114 WP No. 103765 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 11.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM Ct-vh List No.: 3 Sl No.: 66