SARFRAJ AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/10118/2025 · 2025-10-12
Lakshmi Kant Shukla, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59990 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59990 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10118 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the First Information Report dated 11.05.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No. 0171 of 2025, under Sections 64, 74, 76, 115(2) B.N.S. 2023, Police Station Tarkulwa, District Deoria.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vinay Kumar Rai, State Law Officer appearing on behalf of the State, Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant and perused the material available on record.
3. After some length of arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant informs the Court that the investigation has been completed, charge-sheet has been filed on 03.07.2025 and cognizance has already been taken by the concerned Court.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned counsel for the State as well learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to him under the law.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed, charge-sheet has been filed and cognizance has already been taken, we do not find any good reason to keep this matter pending for Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Tiwari Sarfraj Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law, as advised. October 13, 2025 Arti CRLP No. 10118 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad