- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14015 MFA No. 22703 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 22703 OF 2013 (MV-I) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., SUJATHA COMPLEX, P.B. ROAD, DHARWAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, ARIHANT PLAZA, KESHWAPUR, HUBLI-23. …APPELLANT (BY MISS ANUSHA SANGHAMI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.K. KAYAKAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KIRAN HANUMANTAPPA GAVARAWAD, AGE: 08 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: BETAGERI, TQ: GADAG, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER HANUMANTAPPA RAMANNA GAVARAWAD, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BETAGERI, TQ: GADAG. 2. SRI. VINAYAK NAGAPPA PALANAKAR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. BRAMMA CHAITANYA PARK, 2ND NEAR SADANAKERI, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURESH P. HUDEDAGADDI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.2 IS SERVED) GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14015 MFA No. 22703 of 2013 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO CALL THE RECORDS, HEAR THE PARTIES, AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AS PRAYED FOR BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 15-04- 2013 PASSED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GADAG IN M.V.C. NO.259/2011, WITH COST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) 1. Heard Ms.Anusha, who appears through Video Conference and represents Sri.S.K.Kayakamath, learned counsel on record for the appellant. Also heard Sri.Suresh Hudedgaddi, learned counsel for respondent No.1 who appears before this Court physically. 2. Projecting that the sum that is awarded as compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadag through orders in MVC No.259/2011 dated - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14015 MFA No. 22703 of 2013 15.04.2013 is exorbitant, respondent No.2 therein preferred the present appeal. 3. Arguing the matter, Ms.Anusha, who represents the appellant submits that, no evidence whatsoever was produced by respondent No.1/claimant to establish that he suffers with permanent physical disability. No doctor was examined and no disability certificate produced. But the Tribunal granted Rs.1,73,865/- in total as compensation and hence an appeal is filed. Learned counsel thereby seeks to reduce the sum that is awarded as compensation. 4. On the other hand, the submission that is made by Sri.Suresh P. Hudedgaddi, learned counsel for respondent No.1 is that, respondent No.1, a boy aged 6 years, met with a road traffic accident and suffered a lot with the injuries sustained. He took treatment as an inpatient for a period of 9 days and was confined to bed for about 3 months. He could neither go to school during that period nor attend his normal pursuits. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14015 MFA No. 22703 of 2013 Therefore, the Tribunal awarded justifiable sum as compensation. 5. It is not in dispute that respondent No.1/claimant sustained a crush injury resulting in dislocation of the first metatarsal of great toe. Equally it is not in dispute that he took treatment as an inpatient for 9 days and spent Rs.13,865/- for treatment. The Tribunal, through the impugned order, granted a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards ‘pain and agony’, Rs.13,865/- towards ‘medical expenses’, Rs.10,000 for nursing Rs.5,000/- towards ‘loss of income of the attendant’, Rs.10,000/- towards ‘future medical expenses’, Rs.20,000/- towards ‘loss of marriage prospects’ Rs.20,000/- towards ‘loss of academic year in education’ and Rs.20,000/- due to shortening of life span. 6. Without there being any evidence regarding disability and the requirement of future medical expenses, the Tribunal granted compensation under those heads. A - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14015 MFA No. 22703 of 2013 sum of Rs.10,000/- is granted towards ‘future medical expenses’ and Rs.20,000/- towards ‘loss of marriage prospects’. This Court is of the view the amount thus granted totaling Rs.30,000/- is unjustifiable. Therefore, the appeal is disposed of with the following order: ORDER i. The appeal is allowed in part. ii. The compensation that is granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadag through orders in MVC No.259 of 2011 dated 15.04.2013 is reduced by Rs.30,000/-. iii. The amount in deposit, if any, be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal immediately. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE Gab/CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48