[2025:RJ-JP:6458] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1840/2025 Totaram @ Vinod S/o Babulal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Chinayata Thana Suroth District Karauli Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) Order 13/02/2025 1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below: S.No. Particulars of the Case 1. FIR Number 158/2021 2. Concerned Police Station Suroth 3. District Karoli 4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 302, 394, 34 of IPC 5. Offences added, if any Under Section 120-B IPC 6. Date of passing of impugned order 14.03.2024 2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the [2025:RJ-JP:6458] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1840/2025] accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises. 3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail. 4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. Petitioner is behind the bars since 23.05.2021, more than three years have elapsed and certainly fundamental rights of having speedy trial has been infringed. The star witness PW-4 and PW-7 have turned hostile, thus there seems no reason to allow further incarceration. There is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (FARJAND ALI),J 17-Chhavi/-