Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59977 (KAR)

SRI. CHIDANAND S/O GURUPADAPPA ALIAS GANGAPPA v. SRI RAJESH B HUDDAR

CCC/100265/2025 · 2025-08-06

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9913-DB CCC No. 100265 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100265 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. CHIDANAND S/O. GURUPADAPPA @ GANGAPPA, (C. G. PUDAKALAKATTI), AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER CUM CONDUCTOR, N.W.K.R.T.C. 3RD DEPOT, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI DIVISION, R/O SATTI GERI, GUDAUMKERI, TQ. YERAGATTI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAVI HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI RAJESH B. HUDDAR, AGE: MAJOR, WORKING AS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER/DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, NWKRTC, BELAGAVI DIVISION, BELAGAVI-590001. …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.104198/2025 (S-KSRTC) DATED 1ST JULY 2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-C, PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AND ALSO AWARD COST OF THIS PROCEEDINGS, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9913-DB CCC No. 100265 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) Learned counsel for the complainant has filed a memo which reads as follows: “The above contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the interim order passed in W.P. 104198/2025 dated 01-07-2025 vide Annexure-C. During pendency of the above proceedings, the accused-person has complied the interim order passed by the learned single Judge, by placing the complainant in original place of work. In view of the subsequent events and compliance, the complainant does not wish to prosecute the above complaint. Hence, the above contempt petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn.” In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE RH /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34