MUBARAK BADESAB MULLA v. HUJUR BADESAB MULLA AND ORS
CA/3421/2016 · 2025-12-24
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59971 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59971 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
21 CA 228 OF 2016.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 SECOND APPEAL NO. 228 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3421 OF 2016 IN SA/228/2016 MUBARAK BADESAB MULLA VERSUS HUJUR BADESAB MULLA AND ORS ... Advocate for Respondent nos. 2, 3 & 5 : Mr. A.G. Dalal ...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 24.12.2025 PER COURT :
None is present for the appellant.
2.
Learned counsel Mr. Dalal for respondent nos. 2, 3 and 5.
3. The appellant has not responding and appearing before this Court. It was kept for dismissal vide order dated 07.08.2025. Today also the appellant and his counsel are absent.
4. Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
5. Pending Civil Application is disposed of.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:37760